【www.qqxwt.com--读后感】

以前,常听人说《哈姆雷特》是一部优秀的作品。我没有亲见,自然也无从说起。如今,我读了一遍,心中颇有一番感慨。伴随着淡淡的悲伤,哈姆雷特本性之善、意志之坚、复仇的愿望之切等特点,无不在我的脑海中浮现。我...下面是小编收集整理的有关《哈姆雷特》读后感十篇,仅供参考,大家一起来看看吧。

有关《哈姆雷特》读后感十篇

《哈姆雷特》读后感 篇一

  以前,常听人说《哈姆雷特》是一部优秀的作品。我没有亲见,自然也无从说起。如今,我读了一遍,心中颇有一番感慨。伴随着淡淡的悲伤,哈姆雷特本性之善、意志之坚、复仇的愿望之切等特点,无不在我的脑海中浮现。我觉得,哈姆雷特是一个真正的英雄,他的灵魂也因他的英雄举动走得远于他人。

  最初,哈姆雷特是天真的、单纯的,也是幸福的,他对未来充满美好的希望。后来,父亲的暴死、母亲的改嫁,让他觉得一切都天翻地覆了,于是,他失望、孤寂,又开始忧郁了,他无目的地活着。

  恰在此时,鬼魂告诉了他真相,于是,哈姆雷特愤怒了,他也开始觉悟了,他要报仇。

  哈姆雷特凭着自己的智慧,验证了事情的真实性之后,他开始平静下来,他沉思着,自己是否应该担起重任。那时,他的灵魂却没有停下来等待,仍在前进。最终,哈姆雷特做出了决断,他放弃了安逸的生活,放弃了自己的爱情,放弃了……只是他却没有料到克劳狄斯的阴谋,不过,他毕竟在临死前也给了敌人致命的一击。他虽然没有完成自己的使命,他却为实现自己的理想铺平了道路。此时,哈姆雷特的灵魂走得更远了,直到消失在那条通往天堂的大道上,好一个走远的灵魂!

  哈姆雷特是英雄,他是人,而不是神,他也有人性和情爱。正因为如此,他能对母亲发出心底的愤怒,面对奥菲利娅的死,他悲痛欲绝,而当他面对自己的仇人、国家的仇人时,善良的本性又使他犹豫不决、迟迟不愿行动。如今读来,我仍能感受到他当时内心的矛盾和痛苦的挣扎。什么才是英雄?我认为,这才是真正的英雄。

  莎翁的过人之处,在于他摆脱了古人将英雄神化的写法,他写活了哈姆雷特。这个人物感动了读者,让人觉得,仿佛真有这样的一个人站在我们的面前。读罢此剧,我的心里再也不能平静了,胸中掀起的激情使我发出了来自内心的感叹:哈姆雷特,我为你喝彩。

《哈姆雷特》读后感 篇二

  文艺复兴后期的英国乃至整个欧洲,一方面是思想解放,另一方面则是私欲泛滥、社会混乱,人们在“个性解放”的旗帜下为所欲为。

  莎士比亚在剧中说:“这是一个颠倒的时代”。不错,彼时丹麦国的状况是——婚礼紧接着葬礼;敌军压境,宫中却仍在纵欲狂欢;朝廷里众大臣尔虞我诈,互相倾轧;社会上民众群情激奋。

  这就是我们的主人公哈姆莱特生活的时代与环境,这一切造就了他的性格与一系列看似怪异的行为。

  比如哈姆莱特的装疯。该怎样诠释呢?我认为,他一方面是为了迷惑敌人,另一方面则可以畅所欲言,以暴露现实的黑暗,还能惊醒敌人,使其自我暴露。

  再如哈姆莱特的延宕。歌德说这表现了他内心的感伤。柯勒律治说他这是思想过剩。卡尔?魏尔德认为这是他为了证明自己的正义。布拉雷德则认为这表现了他厌世的心理。琼斯从心理学的角度分析,把哈姆莱特的延宕归为俄狄浦斯情节(恋母情结)。马克思主义文艺学从社会学的角度来看,认为这是社会恶势力过于强大,哈姆莱特一个人难以胜任改造社会的历史重任造成的。真可谓仁者见仁,智者见智,一千个读者眼里就有一千个哈姆雷特,究竟孰是孰非呢?还要观众自己去分析、评判。我个人认为,以上观点都有一定的道理,都有其合理性,但若仅以其中一两点来解释显然又是片面的。所以,正是如此丰富多样的理由形成了我们的主人公哈姆莱特丰富多彩的性格,鲜明生动,历经数百年仍在世界戏剧舞台上散发着灼灼的光芒。

  又如哈姆莱特的忧郁。从家庭来讲,发生了意料不到的突变——父死母嫁,王位被夺。可我们的忧郁王子又无力承担复仇的责任,这使他形成了非常强烈的心理压力。残酷而又黑暗的现实使他原本信仰的人文主义理想破灭了,他发现了自然和人类社会的病态,产生了“生存还是死亡”这类对人的终极拷问。

  本剧的一大亮点是对哈姆雷特内心冲突的表现。他追求理想,又失望于现实。他向往人性之善,又深信人性本恶。他想重整乾坤,又深感自己无能为力。他厌倦人生,又恐惧死亡。他爱恋人和母亲,又恨她们脆弱。

  古希腊时期的戏剧主要表现人与外部世界自然力之间的冲突,而莎士比亚则着力于表现人与人及人自身的理智、信念与情感、欲望之间的冲突,是为心灵悲剧。外在冲突起因于内在精神、心理的差异,最终是为展示心灵服务的。莎士比亚在剧中对哈姆莱特心灵悲剧的成功表现,显示了文艺复兴文学的最高成就。该剧充分展示了人的内心世界、情感特征和欲望要求,反映了文艺复兴时期追求人本主义、反对禁欲主义、要求个性解放的文艺思潮。

  哈姆莱特是什么人?

  毫无疑问,我们的主人公是一个封建王朝的王子。但他同时又是威赛克斯的化身,他是疯子、是死神,是思想者、是实干家,他是厌世者、是伤感派才子,是替罪羊。

《哈姆雷特》读后感 篇三

  莎士比亚的《哈姆雷特》主要讲述了丹麦王子哈姆雷特为了替父报仇装疯,一天,他叔叔国王克劳斯迪派王后劝说哈姆雷特,哈姆雷特与母亲发生争执,误杀了躲在帏幕后偷听的首相。叔叔想借英国国王之手除掉哈姆雷特,被哈姆雷特识破,中途返回,正好赶上了奥菲利娅的葬礼,叔叔挑起奥菲利娅哥哥和哈姆雷特的决斗,准备了毒酒和毒剑哈姆雷特先获胜,国王假意祝贺给哈姆雷特送毒酒,但他没喝。后来哈姆雷特又赢了,王后把毒酒喝了。第三回合,哈姆雷特中了毒剑,又夺对手的剑刺了对手一剑。最后,王后毒死,奥菲利娅哥哥也揭露了叔叔的阴谋,哈姆雷特把叔叔刺死,自己也毒发身亡。

  哈姆雷特在我眼中是一个特别的人物,他从一个善良的王子,久经磨难,一步步走向了勇敢成熟的战士。他面对复仇,道德,与爱情种种不一样的态度,在复仇中表现的种种徘徊于后退,让这个故事展现在我们面前非常真实。

  哈姆雷特在与叔叔慢慢斗争的同时,黑暗的社会不断显露出来,使他认为世界的美好渐渐瓦解。黑暗的社会使他加快了复仇的脚步,我从影片中看出来它的装疯卖傻是进过深思熟虑的,他的报仇的意志在困难中越来越坚定,他告诉我们要勇敢去面对世界,绝境中锻炼自己,深思熟虑做好每一件事。

  哈姆雷特在墓地中通过掘墓人的话看透额生生死死:不管多么富有或多么贫穷的人,最后都是白骨一堆。这告诉了我们多思考,看透每一个小事。

  最后一刻,皇后毒死,哈姆雷特和他的对手也都中毒,将要死亡,他了解真相后,愤怒的刺死叔叔,与他同归于尽。这是他复仇的终结。他完成了复仇告诉我们做事情要坚持不懈,不怕输的"精神。

哈姆雷特的英语读后感 篇四

  Shakspere (wrong spelling) created Hamlet--a man with wisdom and courage .In order to revenge on his uncle for killing his father he pretented (spelling mistake) to be mad and suffered a series of misery. On the contrary we can also say that Hamlet is rude and selfish for he did not think twice before his revenge .

  if (Capitalize "If" since it is the beginning word of the sentence.) a country has no king how can a country keep alive (You need a question mark here since it is a question.) So every thing has two sides the bright side and adumbral side.

  Every time we make a decision we have to think twice. Comment:Be careful with your spelling grammar and punctuation. Too many uncessary mistakes. It is good that you looked at both the dark and bright sides of Hamlet. Thats quite objective and convincing.

哈姆雷特的英语读后感 篇五

  “To be, or not to be, that is the question”。 But after answering this question, what comes next? To be in what kind of ways may bring you the value of life? And is the value precious enough for you to continue living? These are questions that can never be solved. Hamlet chose to live, in order to revenge the tragic death of his honest father, the Danish king. On account of Hamlet was so kind, he missed the best chance of killing his uncle, the murderer of his father. The uncle, who was the new king, devised several plans to kill Hamlet, indirectly killed Hamlet’s beloved Ophelia、Ophelia’s brother and father, and Hamlet’s mother, the new queen who was married to his uncle. These tragedies finally forced Hamlet to make his decision, and stabbed the sword of revenge to his uncle. Unfortunately, Hamlet was already hurt by a sword with poison on it and would be dead quickly at the moment. It was the kindness and hesitation made him fail. For his father, died while having a grasping dream and went to hell for that. Hamlet didn’t kill his uncle while he was praying because if he killed him at that time, he would have gone to heaven. Hamlet didn’t want to return good for evil, this irresolute nature caused the failure of his revenge. But why would god send a person to heaven or hell only considering what he’s thinking about at the last moment of lif.

哈姆雷特的英语读后感 篇六

  "Hamlet" about to complete in 1601. It is above all a plot of revenge tragedy of ups and downs, the most fascinating is that Hamlets "hesitation": his revenge delay action until the last minute plot development. Dramatic beginning, there ghost of the kings of the things Claudius murdered Hamlet informed, ready to go on a revenge.

  However, Hamlet worried that this is "the devil" mischief, or the death of his father because of his depression caused by the sky, so the words do not believe in ghosts, but rather trying to view Claudius of a "play within the play" a reflection of themselves to determine whether he is the culprit. He could at confession by Claudius when he was killed, but out of religious considerations and do not want to start at this time, the other into heaven.

  Until he and Leietisi fencing, his mother mistakenly drank the original Claudius poisoned wine prepared for him to die, he was struggling to Pichu sword of vengeance, and he eventually fell in bloody revenge.

哈姆雷特的英语读后感 篇七

  “To be, or not to be, that is the question”。 But after answering this question, what comes next? To be in what kind of ways may bring you the value of life? And is the value precious enough for you to continue living? These are questions that can never be solved.

  Hamlet chose to live, in order to revenge the tragic death of his honest father, the Danish king. On account of Hamlet was so kind, he missed the best chance of killing his uncle, the murderer of his father. The uncle, who was the new king, devised several plans to kill Hamlet, indirectly killed Hamlet’s beloved Ophelia、Ophelia’s brother and father, and Hamlet’s mother, the new queen who was married to his uncle.

  These tragedies finally forced Hamlet to make his decision, and stabbed the sword of revenge to his uncle. Unfortunately, Hamlet was already hurt by a sword with poison on it and would be dead quickly at the moment. It was the kindness and hesitation made him fail.

  For his father, died while having a grasping dream and went to hell for that. Hamlet didn’t kill his uncle while he was praying because if he killed him at that time, he would have gone to heaven. Hamlet didn’t want to return good for evil, this irresolute nature caused the failure of his revenge. But why would god send a person to heaven or hell only considering what he’s thinking about at the last moment of lif.

哈姆雷特的英语读后感 篇八

  "Hamlet" about to complete in 1601. It is above all a plot of revenge tragedy of ups and downs, the most fascinating is that Hamlets "hesitation": his revenge delay action until the last minute plot development. Dramatic beginning, there ghost of the kings of the things Claudius murdered Hamlet informed, ready to go on a revenge. However, Hamlet worried that this is "the devil" mischief, or the death of his father because of his depression caused by the sky, so the words do not believe in ghosts, but rather trying to view Claudius of a "play within the play" a reflection of themselves to determine whether he is the culprit. He could at confession by Claudius when he was killed, but out of religious considerations and do not want to start at this time, the other into heaven. Until he and Leietisi fencing, his mother mistakenly drank the original Claudius poisoned wine prepared for him to die, he was struggling to Pichu sword of vengeance, and he eventually fell in bloody revenge.

哈姆雷特的英语读后感 篇九

  Created in 1600 —— 1601 Hamlet had been admired for centuries. Is to at the moment, still feel his vocal. And all this is not the plot, also not only only is excellent literary technique, it is reflected by the problem. In general,

  It describes a kind of extremely primitive, people.

  The hero Hamlet first dealing with your original ideal world. At the start of the benefits in some Hamlet "childhood", he did you experience any huge setback, living environment is more simple, always learning western orthodoxy. But in the end, noble, to adore the father died, less than a month is virtuous mother remarried his uncle to usurp the throne. This made him wonder in the world. And after this doubt directly contributed to his hesitation. He realized that they are not perfect it, chastity but desire, moral victory over greed. He thinks you should go to revenge, but the moral person is his mother; His uncle killed his father and he is a person, is a persons thoughts. But even if revenge success, again how? He said: "to be or not to be, this is a question worth thinking about" life is a pain, but the fear of death and have less absolute. He met a problem, cant answer is unavoidable.

  Hamlets situation is not the only, the life of big hands to hold each one is so tight.(.)

  The old kings death, which are not related and queen. But as a woman she faces two kinds of selection, it is moral or desire. She chose the latter. However she scorned by the Hamlet and criticism, moral emptiness has brought her considerable pain, in fact, the queen is a kind person, she is not morally repugnant. She is to choose what kind of misfortune, not in the selection of your own destiny.

  The new king, the uncle usurped the throne, he is the biggest villain in the play leading role. He wanted to the throne, and to the queen with desire. But the king was others. Is his brother, he dont deserve the throne. He, like all of the faces the loss of the ideal world in my heart. But he strenuously to win, but at the moment, he was a hero general spirit, he bravely to fight for originally do not belong to own. But it is also the tragedy. He paid the price, his hands stained with the blood of others, cannot repent. In later, he found Hamlet after knowing the truth, he began to save themselves may lose the happiness of life. He hovered between sin and rational, in the end he didnt jump out, died in his own sword.

哈姆雷特的英语读后感 篇十

  " Hamlet " of Shakespear is a classical representative work. This book certainly does not have the big difference in the superficial plot with the historical fable, spoke or the Danish prince the story which revenged for the father, in which fills the rank smell of blood violence and dies.Just like the dramatis personae Horatio said: " you may hear to to rape massacre, the unusual repair behavior, the dark center decision, accidental slaughter, borrows the hand murder , as well as falls into suicide result." Windingly elects the plot, tightly centers on the revenge to launch.

  Hamlet Wittenberg hurries back the home in a hurry from Germany, is attends his father‘s funeral, enables him to accept, he not catches up with father‘s funeral, actually witnessed the mother and the Uncle Claudius‘ wedding ceremony, this had caused Hamm the Wright suspicion at the heart, added night above meets in the royal palace castle with father‘s ghost, the ghost sorrow sued, this pile atrocity was Uncle Hamlet the behavior, and wanted him to revenge for the father.To this, he started the difficult revenge course, launched the life and death contest with Claudius. Finally, sent out sword the revenge to Claudius.

  Hamlet is a man with contradictory,he had many chances to kill Claudius,but he hesitated,which reflects the religious thought poisons.

本文来源:http://www.qqxwt.com/xindetihui/172557.html